Year: 1997
Filming: Color
Length: 194 minutes
Genre: Disaster/Drama/Epic/Romance/Tragedy
Maturity: PG-13 (for language, sexuality, and intense thematic
elements)
Main Cast: Kate Winslet (Rose DeWitt Bukater),
Leonardo DiCaprio (Jack Dawson), Cal
Hockley (Billy Zane), Frances Fisher (Ruth DeWitt Bukater), Victor
Garber (Thomas Andrews), Bernard Hill (Capt. Edward John Smith), Ewan Stuart (First Officer William
Murdoch), Kathy Bates (Molly Brown)
Director: James Cameron
Personal
Rating: 2 Stars
***
When you find yourself cringing almost every time the main
characters make an appearance on screen, it’s a pretty good indication something’s
not quite right. Thus is the case with James Cameron’s epic disaster flick, Titanic. While there may be some
redeeming aspects in the latter half of the movie, they are incapable of
successfully counteracting the cheesy acting, blatant immorality, and
disrespect for another time period that is hammered home at every conceivable
opportunity.
The next sizable portion of the plot involves the three main characters chasing each other around the ship and surviving things normal people probably wouldn’t. The climax of this hide-and-go-seek game occurs when Cal tries to convince Rose to take her seat in a lifeboat, promising if he will get Jack off the ship safely. For a moment she believes him, but then thinks again (I don’t know why!) and leaps back into the ship through the Grand Stateroom window as her boat is being lowered. The result is a major smooch sequence with Jack, and then the appearance a very disgruntled Cal, shooting at them with his pistol!
Kate Winslet stars
as Rose DeWitt Bukater, a wealthy young woman who is engaged to an incorrigibly
villainous business tycoon named Caledon Hockley. Among his other manifold
virtues, Cal is a narrow-minded chauvinist who treats Rose like an ornament he
has purchased. Although it is indicated that they have already been living together
as “husband and wife”, she is obviously fed up with him by the time she gets on
board the doomed RMS Titanic and
makes it her priority to throw herself overboard (as if she just can’t wait for
the inevitable!).
But before she can
take the plunge, a devil-may-care, man-of-the-streets named Jack Dawson, played
by Leonardo DiCaprio, manages to exert his boyish charm and pull her back from
the brink. The next day, when Rose meets him on deck to thank him, it is
revealed that he is a starving artist, and what little income he has managed to
earn mainly derives from drawing naked girls in Paris and beyond. And amazingly
for her sophisticated upbringing, Rose doesn’t seem the least bit disturbed by
this little tid-bit. In fact, later on at a first class dinner he is invited to
as a guest for saving her from “falling” overboard, she gushes about his talent
to the assembly!
Sensing her
definite lack of chemistry with straight-laced Cal, Jack invites her to a third
class hoe-down in steerage, where Rose drinks, smokes, stands on her tip-toes
as a challenge to the “big men”, and dances a few Irish jigs with her
naked-picture-doodler. Needless to say, when Cal gets wind of this, he takes it
to heart. And the result is smashed up china and a sobbing Rose whose mother
insists she submit herself to Cal’s tyranny in order to pay off her late
father’s debts.
But Jack is
determined to “save” Rose and convinces her to declare her independence and go
on a wild fling with him on the ship. This includes standing together on the
guard rails of Titanic with arms to
outstretched to create the illusion of flying (innocent enough for starters)
and later posing for a naked picture (I can understand being a patron of the
arts, but…..umm…..) with nothing but Cal’s engagement necklace, “The Heart of
the Ocean”, around her neck. They proceed to a car parked on deck (no fear of
them driving off with it, anyway; no keys!) and go “all out” in the back seat. Things
don’t improve.
By this time, what
we’ve all been waiting for finally occurs, and Titanic meets her Waterloo in the form of a humungous iceberg. The
problems that develop as a result of this don’t stop Cal from framing Jack for
stealing Rose’s necklace and giving her a good slap across the face. (Frankly,
I’m on his side for once!) As it becomes increasingly apparent that the ship is
sinking, Rose refuses to get into a lifeboat and goes in search of Jack in the
bowels of the ship where he has been locked up by the ever-forgiving Cal.
The next sizable portion of the plot involves the three main characters chasing each other around the ship and surviving things normal people probably wouldn’t. The climax of this hide-and-go-seek game occurs when Cal tries to convince Rose to take her seat in a lifeboat, promising if he will get Jack off the ship safely. For a moment she believes him, but then thinks again (I don’t know why!) and leaps back into the ship through the Grand Stateroom window as her boat is being lowered. The result is a major smooch sequence with Jack, and then the appearance a very disgruntled Cal, shooting at them with his pistol!
Needless to say,
they manage to evade him, and, in keeping with his character, he rigs a way to get
a seat in a lifeboat by claiming he has a child. (Couldn’t the officers deduct
that he wasn’t really the fatherly type?) Down under, Rose and Jack are still
running around, sometimes submerged in saltwater, and are only able to clamber
up on deck as Titanic is tilting at
an ominous slant and about to go under for good. By hook or by crook, both the
main characters manage to survive the impact of the ship sinking beneath the
waves by clinging onto the railing where they first met.
Plunged into the icy
waters, Jack helps Rose to climb on top of a piece of floating debris that can
hold only one person. He, meanwhile, remains submerged in the water and
succumbs to hypothermia as a result. Before he dies, he makes the despairing
Rose promise that she will survive no matter what, and go on to have a life and
a family and die an old lady “warm in her bed.” When a lifeboat finally does
show up looking for survivors, she takes a whistle from a floating corpse and
blows it with all her might, enabling her to be found and rescued.
And she does
fulfill her promise to the late doodler, living to a ripe old age and coming
back to claim the naked picture of herself when Titanic is finally relocated at the bottom of the sea and its
treasures brought forth. This should be creepy for those involved, but the
treasure-hunters’ main concern involves the whereabouts of her necklace, “The
Heart of the Ocean.” As it turns out, she still has it, but promptly dumps it
overboard to prevent it from being used for publicity reasons. Soon after, she
passes away peacefully in her sleep and is greeted by Jack and all those who
perished in the shipwreck in an epic reunion in a glorified Grand Stateroom. It
is devoutly to be hoped that an art class isn’t on the list of party
activities.
For having a
plotline so obsessed with the issue of “class”, Titanic notably lacks it. While I might say it is an interesting
perspective to portray Titanic as
symbolic of the “evils of the age” and make her sinking something of a
necessity to usher in a better world with less pride and prejudice, the scenes
range from melodramatic hyperbole to sensationalist stunts, with vulgar language
and actions thrown in as some sort of “spice” that makes one gag. Most of the
characters come off as being flat and two-dimensional, and their interactions
with one another are equally prefabricated, thanks in great part to the modern
acting styles and attitudes depicted.
Cal is too
stereotypically “bad” to be taken seriously. His every move can be predicted
from beginning to end, expect perhaps the “Keystone Cops” chase scene he sets
into motion by taking a few pot shots at the lovers with his pistol. That was
simply too outlandish to be foreseen. On the other hand, Jack is not “good”
enough to be a satisfying hero for me. Can Rose (or anyone) honestly believe
he’s a respecter of the rights and dignities of women? He draws naked girls for
a living, for crying out loud, and I don’t care if they did give him permission!
The point is he is instrumental in debasing the female body as a source of lust
for monetary gain. Plus, he seems to have no qualms about having sex with a
girl he just met a few days ago in someone else’s car parked on the deck of a
ship. Weird.
The fact that Rose
doesn’t find any of this the least bit sketchy just sets the stage for her own
appalling impropriety. She seems to associate “freedom” with being able to
drink, smoke, strip down to be drawn naked, and have sex with a virtual
stranger in awkward locations. For all her “independent womanhood” and
complaints about feeling enslaved, she certainly is selling herself cheap and
diminishing any feelings of sympathy I had for her plight.
I will grudgingly
admit there are a few clear spots in the murky water. As some have said, while
it may be the lousiest romance on the block, Titanic manages to be a decent epic in some respect. When the ship
actually begins to sink, and the hopeless love triangle is not the main focus, the
cinematic special effects have a frightening realism about them. We also get to
see moments of human tenderness and endurance in the midst of tragedy.
A priest comforts
his flock by holding their hands and preaching a sermon from Revelation about
the New Heaven and New Earth. An Irish mother tells a fairy tale to her
children to quiet them, even as the water seeps below deck. An elderly couple
lay next to each other in bed, whispering loving words, waiting for the end to
come. Thomas Andrews, the builder of the ship, remains below deck in a state of
disillusionment and stops the grand clock in the stateroom. The famous
orchestra remains on deck and plays “Nearer My God to Thee” in the midst of the
chaos. Captain Smith, distraught by his inability to save his passengers from
their fate, retreats to his cabin where remains until the glass smashes from
the pressure of the water and he goes down with his ship.
I thought it was a
nice touch that Rose chose to identify herself as “Rose Dawson” to demonstrate
the way he had changed her life by ostensibly “rescuing” her from a confining
future and giving her a chance to live a full life. This element of gaining a
second chance is further highlighted by the close-up on the Statue of Liberty
as her ship anchors in New York and the pictures that are shown lined up on her
end-table in her elderly years. I was also relieved that the ending made some
allusion to the afterlife, even if it was a bit corny and theologically
simplistic, since it did succeed in giving the tragedy something of a hopeful
finale.
The music score
is, for the most part, top-notch, especially the tracks “Hymn to the Sea” with
it’s ethereal Celtic overtones, “Southampton”, booming with the grandeur of the
great ship, “Titanic Set”, a series of Irish reels from Gaelic Storm, and “Rose” which introduces the love theme for the
first time. Of course, this theme will be expanded and developed in the theme
song, “My Heart Will Go On”, which I find touching if a bit vague in its meaning. With
its connections to New York, the sea, and the afterlife, the film score tends
to remind me quite a bit of my late grandmother.
That having been
said, much of the real-life heroics of the sinking of RMS Titanic are skipped over or minimalized in favor of creating a
sense of purposelessness and taking a jab at “the old ways”. The
stiff-upper-lip courage of the British officers on the ship is recast as
nothing more than buffoonish pride. The English passengers in steerage are
totally unrepresented, even though they formed the largest percentage below
decks. Instead, the Irish steerage
passengers and English officers are pitted against each other to emphasize a
more “simply understood” Anglo-Irish conflict.
First Officer
Murdoch, a real-life hero of the disaster, is shown shooting several rioting
Irishmen before shooting himself out of guilt (which is complete fiction, so
much so that James Cameron had to apologize to Murdoch’s living relations). If
they wanted to add this little subplot for kicks, I don’t understand why they
didn’t just create a fictional character instead of mangling the story of a
real one.
The order “women
and children first” is made to look like a ridiculous vestige of chauvinism.
The gentleman who goes down dressed in him best sipping a brandy is shown in
wide-eyed panic at the end, as if his cool veneer was all just a game he played
to look impressive. Even the “unsinkable” Molly Brown is deprived of her moment
of gallantry, when she commandeered her life-boat and returned to pick up
survivors. And it is worthy to note that while Jack may sacrifice his life for
Rose in an admittedly heart-wrenching scene, we don’t see people given their
lives for strangers in a more supernatural outpouring of love.
But the fact is
that noblesse oblige was made manifest
repeatedly on board the sinking vessel, and it was authentic, not just a game
to look important in front of others. Read real history, and you’ll soon see
that it very much a part of what it meant to be considered a “gentleman.” It
meant education and good-breeding, certainly, but it also meant something more.
It symbolized the duty to be leaders and protectors, the stuff of which heroes
are made. It was the Christian concept that the strong should defend the weak.
The class system
was perverse on any number of levels, and inequality was rampant. Women were
often degraded to an almost sub-human level by men, and the working class was
viewed with snobbish contempt by their “betters”. But the concept that men
should defend women and leaders should lay down their lives for their subordinates
and that death should be faced with grace and dignity is timeless. This is true
even if Hollywood prefers a hedonistic, libertarian, populist worldview.
Titanic
has it’s moments of triumph amidst general movie mayhem, but this is the least
the producers could do to save their romantic tragedy from going down with the
ship. It is highly unlikely I’d care to watch it over again. To reiterate what
I said in my review of The Last of the
Mohicans, shallowness and cynicism pulled the plug on the bulwark of this
film’s plot, and a good portion of it deserves to be locked in a vault at the
bottom of the ocean, along with Rose’s birthday suit picture.
Rose (Kate Winslet) and Jack (Leonardo DiCaprio), surviving things normal people wouldn't! |
Pearl!
ReplyDeleteYou have written the most perceptive and most accurate review ever of this adolescent ice-opera. The stereotypes in Cameron's TITANIC would disgrace a 1960s Blaxploitation film, and the anti-British bigotry is even cruder than Werner Klingler's 1943 Nazi version.
The most accurate film about the Titanic, and the best-acted, is Roy Ward Baker's 1958 A NIGHT TO REMEMBER.
As for Cameron's computer-generated clutter with its insta-emo music, this prolonged Lenten penance, it is so awful in its writing and directing that the most sympathetic character is Cal.
At the end, though, is there a man or woman so hard of heart, so lacking in love, so deficient in the higher sentiments, that he or she cannot shed tears of laughter when Jack freezes to death?
I am honored by your complement, Master Mack, and your ever-insightful commentary. This is indeed an "ice-opera" of the most irksome variety, making a perfect object of Lenten penance for all involved! ;-)
ReplyDeleteI also agree that "A Night to Remember" is by far the best Titanic flick.
Why the heck did you watch this!? Everyone knows the stupidity quotient in this is way beyond the safety levels!
ReplyDeleteAh, yes, Emerald, but I had to join in the experience of the horrified throngs so could have empathy with the vast array of helpless viewers! Plus, the opportunity to yell at the TV is always a good way to let off the steam from living in a woeful world ;-)
ReplyDelete!
Thanks, Pearl of Tyburn! This review saved me a lot of time that would have been wasted by seeing this movie!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Anonymous, for reading! I'm glad the review was of help to you!
ReplyDeleteAs I tried to bring out, there were some things in the film that were okay, but over all I did feel it was pretty much a waste of time. You have chosen the better part, lol!
You must be English. This is the third review of yours I've read, and while I find your reviews hilarious -- please take that as the compliment I intend it to be -- you seem to romanticize the 'upper class' as thoroughly as Cameron romanticized the 'lower class' in 'Titanic'.
ReplyDeleteI agree that there have been aristocrats in every era who did take noblesse oblige seriously -- but in the main, the behavior you laud was reserved for the member's of one's own social class: the lower orders were there to hew the wood, draw the water, provide convenient daughters, and to be reminded, when necessary and as forcefully as necessary, that any attempt to rise above the station in which God had supposedly placed them would not end well. One of the failures of the Christian religion was allowing itself to be co-opted by the upper classes in maintaining their place: moral failures among the lower orders were to be deplored and censured, but those of the upper were to be ignored or glossed over. Rather like your review: the young man from the lower orders should have done the decent thing and starved before drawing pictures of nude women -- but quite all right for the 'gentleman' to buy a wife as if she were a slab of bacon.
And jip, if we're going for realism, in real life the 'gallant' Mrs. Brown had it away with a nearly empty lifeboat, and the majority of the steerage passengers were lost because they couldn't get to the upper decks: the gates were kept locked to keep the grubby, unpleasantly aromatic illiterates from wandering up and spoiling the view for their betters.
Believe me, I think you're right about how marvelous it would be if we all behaved with civility and tolerance. But I don't think we bring that day closer by romanticizing the past because romance idealizes, and there was too much that needed to change.
Thank you for sharing your opinions. It has been fun to read them.
Kellen