Year: 2010
Filming: Color
Length: 100 minutes
Genre: Animation/Fantasy/Family
Maturity: PG (for mild fantasy violence and brief rude
humor)
Cast: Mandy Moore (Rapunzel), Zachary Levi (Flynn
Rider), Donna Murphy (Mother Gothel), Ron Perlman (Stabbington Brother), M.C.
Gainey (Captain of the Guard), Jeffrey Tambor (Big Nose Thug), Brad Garrett (Hook
Hand Thug), Paul F. Tompkins (Short Thug), Richard Kiel (Vlad), Delaney Rose
Stein (Young Rapunzel)
Directors: Nathan Greno and Byron Howard
Personal Rating: 4 Stars
***
For a long while,
people urged towards watching some recently-released 3D animated flicks. I was
generally hesitant, as I tend towards the simpler artistic style of a previous
generation and am wary of excessive CGI. Nevertheless, when I watched the
beginning of Tangled over at a
friend’s house, this fanciful new take on the story of Rapunzel brought a smile
to my face, and I decided I really should take her advice and order it from the
library to see what happened after our heroine knocks the outlaw in the head
with a frying pan!
Our story begins with a flower, a very
special, magical flower that has the power to heal illnesses and unlock the
secret to eternal youth. An old woman named Mother Gothel hordes the flower in
order to make herself young and beautiful ever and anon. But when the queen of
the kingdom becomes deathly ill, soldiers are sent to track down the flower to
heal her. When they finally locate it, she drinks the liquefied golden petals
and is restored to health. Later, her baby daughter winds up having hair as
gold as the flower…and with the same healing and rejuvenating properties!
But Mother Gothel
isn’t about to take the loss of the flower lightly, and she kidnaps the baby princess,
realizing that by fondling her hair and singing the same song she used to sing
to the flower (as the narrator observes, creepy, right?), she is able to restore
her youth and beauty just as well. She keeps the child in a high tower so no one
will find her, and raises the little princess as her own. She is named Rapunzel,
and grows up to be an artistic and spirited teen, turning her tower into a
place of light and creativity. However, she still yearns for contact with the
outside world, which her “mother” always denies her.
However, Rapunzel
gets her chance to sneak away when an unsuspecting, rather cute outlaw named
Flynn Rider climbs into her tower for sanctuary after stealing the royal crown!
She convinces him to be her guide so she can go see the floating lanterns that
are released every year on the long-lost princess’s birthday. Of course,
Rapunzel is unaware that she is in fact said princess, and she just wants to
enjoy the experience and soak in the beauty. So Flynn, a good-at-heart sort of
guy who also has just been hit in the head by a frying pan, agrees that he will
take Rapunzel out on the adventure of a lifetime, and she in return will keep
his bag of treasure safe for him.
Along the way,
they encounter a variety of obstacles, including a gallant mount that seems bent
on trying to sabotage Flynn, soldiers of the king bent on trying to capture
Flynn, and Mother Gothel, who has now realized Rapunzel has escaped and is
determined to get her and her magical hair back to the tower. At the same time,
Rapunzel transforms Flynn and inspires him to give on himself and reform his
roguish behavior.
But as they begin to fall in love, secrets of the past and
misconceptions of the present threaten to tear them apart. Will Rapunzel have
the courage to liberate herself from past bonds and embrace a whole new world?
Tangled is an artistic delight,
combining the best of both worlds with regards to traditional flat-screen
animation and new digitalized 3-D animation. The floating lanterns scene is
particularly dazzling with regards to multi-dimensional effect, song choice,
and general romantic feel. Everything from facial expressions to flowing hair
looked incredibly realistic. The animators and technicians managed to capture
not just accurate form but also movement, not a mean feat whatsoever. They also
managed to capture the flavor of past time periods, and integrate them into a
modern expression. Occasionally I wish the slang was curtailed to keep with an
older mood, but I can take it in stride. As a note, I noticed that the
costuming used for the guards looks like a combination of Ancient Roman Legionaries,
the Vatican Swiss Guards, and British Infantry from the Napoleonic Wars!
Rapunzel is a
charming leading lady with spunk, ingenuity, and quite a bit of courage. While
she loves her smothering “mother”, she cannot bear to remain shut up in her
tower forever, and must allow her spirited nature more room to move. Like the
Lady of Shallot, the final break with the past comes with the arrival of a man,
who finally gives her the chance she’s been waiting for to broaden her
horizons. It was great the way Tangled
had Rapunzel’s golden, healing hair is tied in with the golden flower with
healing powers that was given her ailing mother when she was enduring a
difficult pregnancy. This explains why Mother Gothel kidnaps our heroine to
begin with, and allows her hair to grow so long. This creative explanation in Tangled gives it one up on Frozen, which basically gave explanation
for the incredible princess-powers that generate the plot.
Honestly, I feel
rather sorry for Mother Gothel. She’s self-consumed and can be pretty ruthless
when pushed to desperation. She tries to hoard the magic flower and keep it all
to herself when other people are in need. If she had been willing to share it
to begin with, perhaps she wouldn’t have to go through so much work to keep it
later on. Plus her kidnapping a baby princess for her magic hair in order to be
forever young is pretty parasitic, to say the least! I have to wonder why she
wants to be forever young in the first place...does she have any boy-friend
prospects, or anything?
And yet, I’m
afraid it is her character that makes me have one major reservation about the
movie. For all her faults, Mother Gothel is not your typical Disney witch.
She’s much more human than that. We can’t despise her outright. While her
motives may have started out quite base, she did raise Rapunzel as her own, and
was the only mother the little girl ever knew. There is a scene in which
Rapunzel asks Gothel to go get her some special shell paint for her birthday.
Gothel had just freaked out at Rapunzel when she asked to leave the tower and
go see the lanterns, and now she feels guilty. Hence, even though it will mean
a long journey, she agrees to go as requested.
The point I’m
trying to make is that deep down inside, I believe that in spite of her manic
desire for eternal youth she has come to love Rapunzel, as much as she is
capable of loving anyone, and Rapunzel has come to love her as well. I suppose
I didn’t like the assumption projected in the film that just because Gothel
wasn’t her “real” mother the bond could somehow be instantaneously dissolved
with no further ado. As I’ve expressed in the past, the concept of family as
much as friendship depends more on emotional attachment as opposed to
bloodlines.
To make the whole
situation more intense, Mother Gothel dies a terrible death, falling out of the
tower window after being tripped by Paschal the chameleon, ostensibly one of
the good guys! Rapunzel doesn’t seem lastingly disturbed by this. Granted,
Gothel did stab Flynn a few minutes earlier, but all of these complex
relationships should have put Rapunzel in therapy by now! I mean, this woman
who has been the only mother you’ve ever known dies horribly in front of your
eyes, and how is the restoration of Flynn supposed to make up for that and give
the finale an oh-too-happy feel?
I would have liked
it so much better if Gothel had actually had a conversion experience, realizing
that the most important thing is relationships, not physical beauty. Otherwise,
she could have just disappeared into the forest or something, and spared us all
from some of the traumatic connotations! I’m totally in favor of Rapunzel
getting away from her, since has shown herself to be a possessive spirit and
toxic character, but does it all have to end so gruesomely? Especially for a
kiddie flick?
Of course, there
is a redeeming aspect to all this, since Flynn sacrificially cuts off Rapunzel’s
magic hair that could have healed him after being stabbed. Like in Beauty and the Beast, the protagonist
dies, but is restored to life through the tears of his lady love. The only loss
here…I miss Rapunzel’s cool, glowing, song-reactive, healing, youth restoring,
golden flower hair! :-(
But beyond all
these rather intense aspects, there is some genuinely humorous content, mostly
revolving around the irrepressible Flynn and his less-than-amicable horse who
is “out to get him”! Also, we get to stop by “The Snuggly Duckling Inn”,
un-aptly named thug-land extraordinaire! Even though some of the action
sequences are over-extended and over-the-top, the mix between excitement and
character development is pretty good. Plus, Flynn’s narration is genuinely hilarious,
and helps draw the viewer into the story as one of his confederates. I’m
thinking here of the method used in Sir Laurence Olivier’s outstanding production
of Richard III…only this is the fun
version!
Needless, to say,
the “Prince Charming” bit just doesn’t enter the equation here! Not that I mind
in this case (Flynn, for the most part, rocks!), although I do like my fair
share of genuinely noble nobleman too,
and sometimes think there is a modern conspiracy afoot to constantly belittle
the landed and make them horrendously unheroic. Nevertheless, it should be
noted that Rapunzel is a royal, as are her parents (whose characters are
scarcely explored at all, but still they seem like good-guys). Hence, there isn’t
a complete bias towards the lower classes…;-)
So my generally
feeling towards Disney’s reboot of the Rapunzel story is mostly positive, with
a few reservations, mostly involving Mother Gothel. The artistic quality alone is impressive, and
the plot holds together much better than some other Disney princess stories
such as the botched-up Brave and to a
lesser extent the frazzled Frozen. Some
believe that Tangled may in fact have
ushered a neo-Renaissance for Disney studios. Whether or not the productions
live up to this hoped-for generational trend is yet to be ascertained, but Tangled at least will continue to be
enjoyed as a classic for years to come, entertaining, thrilling, and teaching
lessons about spiritual freedom and sacrificial love.
Flynn Rider (Zachary Levi) and Rapunzel (Mandy Moore) fall in love |
I'm glad you enjoyed "Tangled", Pearl! Honestly, its probably my favorite Disney movie out there. Not only is it visually beautiful, it also has lovable characters (Flynn Ryder, anyone?;-) and a great, comprehensible story line.
ReplyDeleteIt was interesting to hear your thoughts on Mother Gothel,though...personally, I loved her a a villian(ess), but I can understand your point: she and Rapunzel actually did seem to care for each other, and it was kind of confusing when Rapunzel recovered from Gothel's horrific death so quickly:-O
My friends all urged me to watch this movie, and I'm glad they did. I enjoyed it way more than I thought I would.
ReplyDeleteOn another note, you have never truly experienced Rapunzel's opening song "When Will My Life Begin?" until you have heard it sung by three teenage boys.