Filming: Color
Length: 142 minutes
Genre: Action/Drama/Romance
Maturity: PG (for mild language and sexual innuendos)
Cast: Anthony Andrews (Sir Percy Blakeney), Jane
Seymour (Marguerite St. Just), Sir Ian McKellan (Paul Chauvelin), Malcolm
Jamieson (Armande St. Just), Dominic Jephcott (Sir Andrew Ffoulkes), Christopher
Villiers (Lord Anthony Dewherst), Denis Lill (Count de Tournay), Ann Firbank
(Countess de Tournay), Tracey Childs (Suzanne de Tournay), Richard Charles (The
Dauphin), Julian Fellowes (The Prince Regent)
Director: Clive Donner
Personal Rating: 4 Stars
***
I first
read Baroness Orczy’s The Scarlet
Pimpernel in grade-school, and for a girl with my imagination and love of
romantic historical adventures, I found the concept exhilarating. After all,
this was the prototype of the all the swashbuckling heroes with dual
identities, from Zorro to Superman. But instead of the Colonial Southwest or
the bustling Metropolis, this one was planted firmly in the old world and
commuted between the historical rivals, England and France. Just my style, and
obviously I’m not the only one who thought so since quite a few film
adaptations sprung to life. The following film is just such a dramatic
endeavor.
Anthony Andrews
stars as Sir Percy Blakeney, English gentleman and seemingly incorrigible fop
who most everyone views as a harmless and brainless party animal with a gourmet
taste for clothing and travel. However, his sojourns in France reveal another
side to his character: that of the Scarlet Pimpernel, daring rescuer of
aristocrats condemned to the guillotine by the French Revolutionary government!
With an array of disguises at his disposal and a handful of
chosen companions at his side, his pursuers are unable to bring him in, and his
successes across the channel make him the toast of the table back home in
England.
During one of his missions in
France, Percy rescues one Armand St. Just from a severe beating and falls in
love with his glamorous sister, Marguerite St. Just, a French actress who is
soon drawn to the passion she detects beneath Percy’s sleepy-eyed countenance.
But there a slight problem: someone is already courting Marguerite, and it’s
none other than Paul Chauvelin, the ruthless agent of the Revolutionary
Committee of Public Safety whose greatest aspiration is to capture The Scarlet
Pimpernel! In spite of his realization of the danger, Percy persists in his
wooing, and charms Marguerite into accepting his proposal of marriage.
But just a
few hours after their marriage in an elegant Catholic ceremony, Percy
learns some shocking news that changes everything. Circumstantial evidence
indicates that Marguerite betrayed a royalist family to the Republican
government, and the entire family was guillotined as a result! The
marriage swiftly turns cold, and Percy retreats into his make-believe shell of
shallow snobbery, much to Marguerite's confusion and disillusionment.
Meanwhile, in his professional life, the Scarlet Pimpernel and his loyal
band (now including Armand St. Just) hatch a plan to rescue King Louis
XVI's young son. But Chauvelin begins to suspect Sir Percy is more than he seems
to be, and travels to England to find out for himself.
Meeting up with a
disgruntled Marguerite, Chauvelin threatens to have her brother Armand arrested
for secretly cooperating with The Scarlet Pimpernel unless she will help him
hunt down his prey. She has no idea that her husband is the man, and is
reluctantly pressured into spying for the French at an elaborate gala including
the Prince of Wales among his guests. She passes on bits of information to
Chauvelin, but then is overcome with remorse and tries to contact the Pimpernel
to warn him. The result is a shocking discovery and climactic finale in a
fortress on the rocky French coast.
I enjoyed this film because it
breathed new life into Baroness Orczy’s classic adventure novel series, and
ironed out some of the vaguer bits from the book and other movie adaptations
without straying too much into the land of revision. I believe the plot
filled in some of the gaps in the relationship between Percy and Marguerite and
also did a better job illustrating the past relationship between her and
Chauvelin. Since this movie did draw from material in both the original book The Scarlet Pimpernel and the third book
in the series El Dorado there was
certainly a roomier feel.
It must always be
brought to the fore that this is a made-for-TV movie, produced in the ‘80’s, so
the artistic quality is what it is. The background music is fits some of the
acting in over-dramatic flair. That having been said, the costuming is
generally a treat to behold. I love Marguerite’s riding outfit in particular,
and all of Percy’s gentleman attire (cravats and all!) are delightful to behold.
However, as I have mentioned in past film reviews, I believe Hollywood
goes the extra mile with of the low-cut bodice style of the 18th century,
trying to heighten sex appeal, which is pretty much a cheap trick to boost ratings through lustful eyes. Another rather unnecessary addition involves
Armand’s “sleeping around”, although this is a brief interlude and was found in
the third book as part of his character.
Getting back to the acting, I feel
that Anthony Andrews tended to overdo the fop part to the point of being quite
obnoxious and rather corny. However, to his credit, he also did an excellent
job candidly revealing the passion beneath the exterior in certain scenes. Once
such scene was when he suddenly revealed his dual identity to Armand. Another
was when he fought to conceal his feelings of disgust from Marguerite after
learning of her supposed betrayal on their wedding day. Also, he makes a good
“gentleman charmer”, from quipping (“They seek him here, they seek him there…”)
to romancing (“You don’t know me now, but you’ll have the rest of your life to
find out!), and fencing (can’t help but enjoy watching the final duel, when
Percy “defrocks” Chauvelin by cutting the buttons from his coat!).
Jane Seymour managed
to “redeem” the character of Marguerite in my opinion (in spite of the hair
style that sort of looks like a poodle sitting on her head!). I never really
liked her in the book or alternate story adaptations because she was portrayed
as selfish and whiney, growing cynical and flippant towards her husband and
refusing to contradict the accusation against her to test Percy and see if he
would love her even if she had sent that family to their deaths. Percy could
not. In this film version, however, Marguerite is a much sweeter and more
loving character, who is deeply hurt and confused by Percy’s sudden coldness,
and takes for granted that he would believe her to be innocent of such cruelty.
Furthermore, even
though he is disillusioned with her, she never completely gives up on him. She indicates
this as they return home from a social function, explaining that she is
confused why he should play the fool in private as well as public. He mutters
that perhaps this in fact the real Percy after all, but Marguerite retorts that
she will never believe that. Also, she
never loses her own innate goodness, and even when she is unsure of the Scarlet
Pimpernel’s identity, she still makes an effort to warn him about Chauvelin
after she was forced to provide him with information. This leads to a deeply
romantic scene in which Marguerite speaks with Percy standing behind her in the
shadows, not knowing who he is, but sensing something familiar about him. She
then tells him that she was innocent of the betrayal, and asks him to lay his
hand on her shoulder to assure her that he is real.
For those who are
fans of The Lord of the Rings, the first response upon seeing Ian McKellan
playing Paul Chauvelin is: “It’s Gandalf!!!” Of course, recognizing this point
might take a few scenes, as he’s quite a bit younger in this flick, but his
voice is wonderfully sardonic and his facial structure memorable. And, like his
fellow British actors Basil Rathbone and Laurence Olivier, he has the talent of
being an equally good villain as he is a hero, and a very fine fencer! (Note:
does anyone find is slightly humorous how every single character in this movie,
whether they are supposed to be French or English, have proper BBC accents?)
I definitely think
this portrayal of Chauvelin fills him out and explains why Marguerite chose to
part company with him, which is refreshing after the vagueness of the book. Basically, she explains that she has become increasingly
aware of the way the revolution had made Chauvelin ruthless and cold-blooded,
in contrast to the young idealist she had originally fallen in love with and
supported. He has changed beyond recall, to the point of betraying her
confidence and maliciously implicating her in the arrest and execution of a
royalist family to destroy her marriage to Percy.
The storyline is
definitely from a royalist slant, which fits in with Baroness Orczy’s own
experiences as an aristocratic exile who had to flee a revolution in Hungary as
a girl. Of course, looking at the broad scope of history, I would have to agree
with her that most revolutions do create a domino effect of anarchy followed by
a worse tyranny than the original one (chalk it up to fallen human nature…).
That having been said, I would definitely put in a good word for many of the
original revolutionaries who had justified complaints against the arrogance and
folly of the establishment.
But beyond
historical realities, I believe there is something about The Scarlet Pimpernel that taps into our deepest yearnings for
romance and adventure, heroism and even an element of hierarchical inequality
(who can deny the magic of the monarchy, the mystical hereditary right to
reign, even among Americans like us?). As C.S. Lewis once said, all these
things are “the tap-root to Eden”, something integral to the human
consciousness that set us apart from all living things as story-tellers and
yarn-weavers. Also, while Sir Percy Blakeney dedicated to an old-fashioned chivalric
honor and enjoys gourmet living, he is willing to risk all the comforts of his
life in France and act the part of the insipid fool in England. This lack of
recognition is epitomized by the wayside English flower that he uses as his
symbol, and stands out poignantly as a symbol for all unsung heroes.
Wait, Gandalf was in this!? Why don't I remember that?
ReplyDeleteYup, Chauvelin was Gandalf!! Just without the long beard, pointy hat, and high-power, wizard-tossing staff...;-)
ReplyDeleteHmm...Jane Seymour's hair must have been too distracting for me to notice anything else...
Delete